Comments on Adobe FrameMaker versus Microsoft WordTypePad2011-08-09T18:04:25ZIconLogichttps://blog.iconlogic.com/weblog/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://blog.iconlogic.com/weblog/2011/08/adobe-framemaker-versus-microsoft-word/comments/atom.xml/Kevin Siegel commented on 'Adobe FrameMaker versus Microsoft Word'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cdec153ef014e8a83d536970d2011-08-10T02:17:57Z2011-08-10T02:17:57ZKevin Siegelhttp://iconlogic.comI disagree TIm. While the versions may be old, his arguments for using FrameMaker over Word for technical documentation are...<p>I disagree TIm. While the versions may be old, his arguments for using FrameMaker over Word for technical documentation are solid. I agree it would be better if he referenced the new stuff. It's an older document, but in many ways still valid.</p>Tim commented on 'Adobe FrameMaker versus Microsoft Word'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cdec153ef014e8a81d026970d2011-08-09T19:45:13Z2011-08-09T19:45:13ZTimKevin, I am not sure this is a good example to post - it references Word 95, 97 & 2000,...<p>Kevin,</p>
<p>I am not sure this is a good example to post - it references Word 95, 97 & 2000, Framemaker 5.5.6 and Blue Sky RoboHelp...</p>
<p>Many of the workflows will have changed quite a lot since then! If there was an updated version of this (or a similar) document it would be better, but I am not sure of the usefulness of this one.</p>