Adobe Captivate 6: Still Unable to Disable…

by Kevin Siegel Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn

Last week I wrote about the project expiry issue people are having when they use the trial version of Captivate 6 to open projects created with the trial version of Adobe Captivate 6.

As I mentioned last week, if you are using the licensed version of Captivate, you can set an expiration date for a project by choosing File > Publish Settings. From the Project category at the left, you can select Start and End and then select Project Expiry Date.

Project Expiry Date set.

Last week I mentioned that the expiry issue can be resovled for trial users if someone using a licensed version of the software simply opens an expired project and sets an expiration date for a date in the future.  

I've gotten several emails from people using the trial version of Captivate who are still having issues previewing projects that were created with the trial software. It turns out that the issue is with those projects that were opened with the licensed version of the software, saved and then closed (but never published with a future expiration date). 

When I created the data files for my new Adobe Captivate 6: The Essentials and Adobe Captivate 6: Beyond the Essentials books, I created the projects with both the trial and licensed versions of Captivate 6. Just prior to posting the projects on my web server for people to download, I opened each projects with the fully licensed version of the software, saved and then closed.

Once I heard that people were having trouble previewing project files with the trial software I got nervous. As a test, I downloaded the project files used in both books from my server. I then opened the downloaded projects on a PC running the trial version of Captivate 6. I was able to work on the projects without issue. However, when I previewed the project, I was mortified to see a project expiration message.

Project expiry message.

Since I had never set an expiration date for any of the projects that were posted to the web server, it's clear that the expiration date was self-imposed by the Captivate 6 trial.

In the end, I re-opened every project using my licensed version of Captivate 6. I set the Project Expiry Date to March 31, 2016, and then saved and closed each project. (I did not republish any of the projects.)

Expiration date set for 2016. 

I re-posted the edited projects to my web server. Then I re-downloaded the files to the PC running the trial version of Captivate 6. Not only did the projects open, they previewed and published perfectly. 

This expiration drama is something new in Adobe Captivate 6, and I'm hoping the limitation will be lifted at some point by an Adobe patch or update. In any event, if you are using my Captivate books, you won't have to worry about this issue again until 2016. By then, I'm pretty confident we'll be talking about Adobe Captivate 8… or 9. 

Note:
 If you are going to use the trial version of Captivate to work through my Captivate books, you should visit my site and download the newest data files. If you downloaded the data files last week, keep in mind that I just uploaded the "fixed" data files to my server over the past few days. If you downloaded the data files for either of my new Captivate 6 books earlier than last Friday, please throw the files away and download the updated files. All of the files will have modification dates of August 31, 2012. If you are using the licensed version of Captivate, there is no need to download the files again.

*** 

Looking to learn Captivate quickly? We offer two live, online Captivate 6 classes. Adobe Captivate Essentials and Adobe Captivate Beyond the Essentials (Advanced).

Writing & Grammar: Pronoun Case

by Jennie Ruby Follow us on Twitter View our profile on LinkedIn

Here are the answers to last week's challenge, brought to you by Karen Wegner, the first to provide a completely correct answer:

  1. Jennie and I went to the playground.
  2. The guard opened the gate for Jennie and me.
  3. The cheerleaders all came over to Jennie's and my house.
  4. Jennie and I drove to North Carolina last weekend.
  5. The clerk gave Jennie and me a discount on the tickets.
  6. Did Jennie or I leave the Chinese food on the counter overnight?

Other completely correct answers came from Leigh Pedwell, Jing Ping Fan, Stacey Edwards, Daniel Jones, and Krista Allen, and those who missed only the detail of Jennie's and my were Brenda Sing, Mary Anne Benvenutti, Jenny Chappell, Zoe Cohen, Jodi Hill, Chris Zimmel, Tara Allen, and Sonia Verma.

The hardest example in the challenge was clearly number 3, with everyone getting my correct, but only some people making their way to the completely correct Jennie's and my. A couple of respondents went with our instead of Jennie's and my, which is also correct.

Here is an explanation of Jennie's and my. If two people co-own something, the apostrophe-s goes on the second name only, and covers both people, like this: Jan and Dean's songs. They co-own the songs. You use two separate apostrophe-s's if the two people own separate items:

Tom's and David's cars are in the parking garage. [Two separate cars owned by separate people]

But when the second person is represented by a pronoun, there is no apostrophe-s to show that the first person is part of the ownership, so you have to put the apostrophe-s on the name and also use the possessive pronoun:

Jennie's and my house [we co-own it]

As Tara Allen pointed out, that looks an awful lot like the individual ownership of Tom's and David's cars discussed above. However, there is a crucial difference that makes things clear: no s on house. There is only one house, co-owned. If there were separate houses, we would write it this way:

Jennie's and my houses are on the same street.

Krista Allen gets a special callout for noticing an additional problem with number 6. The way it was originally worded, it seemed to be asking simply, "Did one of us leave the Chinese food out?" However, the listing of Jennie and I separately in the original seems to imply that the person is really asking which of the two people did it. Allen suggests this alternative wording: "Did I leave the food on the counter overnight, or was it Jennie?" This rewording gets at the question of which person did it, but I would tweak it further to make the two questions parallel. The verb in the first part is did leave and the verb in the second part is was. For parallelism I would recommend "or did Jennie?" At that point, I would also go to the tradition of naming the other person first, and make it "Did Jennie leave the Chinese food on the counter, or did I?"

Speaking of listing the other person first, Michael Proodian raised the question of this common [incorrect] wording:

Me and Jennie went to the playground.

For politeness, formal language requires putting the other person's name first rather than me or I. (In fact, a name is typically used first when in conjunction with any pronoun.) And then, of course, me should be I, because the pronoun I is one of the subjects of the verb went: I went.

Here is your next challenge. Choose the correct pronoun:

  1. Who's/whose shoes are in the dryer?
  2. Who's/whose on first?
  3. To who/whom should I address my cover letter?
  4. Who/whom painted your dining room?
  5. Who/whom shall I say is calling?
  6. You gave your camp stove to who/whom?
  7. Those guys in the stretch limo are who/whom?
  8. Who/whom do you think will be elected?
  9. Who/whom do you think they will nominate?
  10. Who/whom do you think will win?

***

If you like Jennie's articles, you'll love her classes. Join her online and learn about Writing Effective eLearning Voiceover Scripts and eLearning: Writing Step-by-Step Scripts and Training Documents.